The Government will “ask for beauty… expecting new development to be beautiful”, according to its recent White Paper, “Planning for the Future”. In so doing, it has added a fresh perspective to a debate that has been discussed for at least 2,000 years: can architecture be beautiful and if so, what does that mean?
The panel discussion - sponsored by Montagu Evans - asked architects, developers and planning authorities:
Does our planning system sufficiently recognise beauty?
Will the Government’s proposals help or hinder the delivery of beauty?
In relation to cities and architecture, what does beauty mean anyway?